I'm revising for my GCSEs so this blog will be a mixture of fandoms and weeping.
I've met Jenna Coleman and Andrew Scott, if you want to hear about them then message me and I will ramble on for hours describing every second of these encounters.
One of my favourite moments from and afternoon with Mark Gatiss and Friends was when someone in the audience began to ask a question starting with ‘This is aimed towards Derren’. Then Andrew shouted ‘No!’ And moved in front of Derren, at which point everyone else on stage formed a human shield to protect Derren.
I just want to say how amazing what Peter Capaldi did for that boy was, but I’d like to comment on the fact that all the headlines (including trending descriptions etc.) say ‘Peter Capaldi sends video to nine-year old autistic boy’. What? Why is it necessary for it to say this boy has autism? Would they put 'Peter Capaldi sends video to nine-year old blond boy’? No, because it’s unnecessary information and it’s promoting an idea that autism defines someone, which it doesn’t. Any nine-year old would be grieving and they don’t have to have autism for that, putting a label on autism isn’t how society should be dealing with it, it is a part of someone along with the millions of other parts of their personality, intelligence and emotions. Along with the fact that autism is a spectrum, it’s not quite as black and white as people make it out to be, it’s not like having a disease; it’s a sliding scale that everyone is on.
“omg I hate when people think twelve and clara have a romantic relationship, it’s so obviously father daughter”
“omg I hate when people say twelve and clara have a father daughter relationship, there’s obviously more to it”
all we know is twelve and clara have a time traveler and his companion relationship and until something else is proven IT’S NOT“OBVIOUSLY” ANYTHING MORE
